The Muslim Brotherhood's Secret Plan: Brigitte Gabriel Exposes the 1991 Explanatory Memorandum and Why Sharia Law Threatens America

In this video, Brigitte Gabriel presents and reads from a 1991 document attributed to the Muslim Brotherhood, titled "An Explanatory Memorandum on the General Strategic Goal for the Group in North America."

She describes it as a plan for "civilization jihad" aimed at destroying Western civilization from within by sabotaging American society through various front organizations. Gabriel references its use as evidence in the Holy Land Foundation terrorism trial, which resulted in numerous guilty verdicts, and highlights specific groups allegedly involved in internal subversion.

• Introduction to the Muslim Brotherhood's 1991 memorandum and its title

• The document's role as evidence in the Holy Land Foundation trial, the largest terrorism trial in U.S. history, leading to 108 guilty verdicts for funding terrorist organizations

• Reading of a key paragraph describing "civilization jihad" as a process to eliminate and destroy Western civilization from within, using Americans' own hands to make Islam victorious over other religions

• The last page listing 29 front Islamic organizations in the U.S. dedicated to sabotaging America internally

• Examples of listed organizations: Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) as advisors to President Obama on Middle East policy; Muslim Student Association (MSA) with extensive chapters on college campuses; North American Islamic Trust (NAIT) owning deeds to over 90% of U.S. mosques

• The plan's focus on targeting every sector of American society, including publishing, media, and education, for non-military sabotage

• Distinction from direct military threats by groups like ISIS and Al-Qaeda, with mention of 150 known terrorist organizations operating in the U.S., including five in the District of Columbia

While the video focuses on the Muslim Brotherhood's alleged strategies for cultural and institutional infiltration, it implicitly raises concerns about Islamist ideologies, including Sharia law, which some argue conflict with core U.S. Constitutional principles like separation of church and state, equal protection under the law, freedom of speech, and gender equality. However, compatibility is a debated topic, with interpretations of Sharia varying widely—some view it as personal religious guidance compatible with secular systems, while others see certain traditional applications as incompatible with Western democratic values.

If you're concerned about these issues (and should be) and align with the video's perspective, fill out the online petition at NoShariaLaw.Org to voice opposition.